Saraswathy vs Subbulakshmi Advocate - Hari Krishnan.M — 7/2024

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7,R1. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNCB190000492024

Part Heard

Next Hearing

09th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

54/2024

Filing Date

23-01-2024

Registration No

7/2024

Registration Date

24-01-2024

Court

Sub Court, Mettupalayam

Judge

2-Subordinate Judge, Mettupalayam

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section O7,R1
IA/3/2025 Classification : Petition to Set-aside Exparte Order or Decree Section SubbulakshmiSaraswathy
IA/4/2025 Classification : Petition to Set-aside Exparte Order or Decree Section SubbulakshmiSaraswathy

Petitioner(s)

Saraswathy

Adv. Srinivasan.R

T.Senthilkumar

T.Ashok kumar

Respondent(s)

Subbulakshmi Advocate - Hari Krishnan.M

The Sub Registrar,

Adv. Siva Suresh.M

The District Collector

Adv. Siva Suresh.M

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Subordinate Judge, Mettupalayam

22-04-2026

Part Heard

07-04-2026

Part Heard

10-03-2026

Part Heard

10-02-2026

Part Heard

07-01-2026

Part Heard

Interim Orders

24-06-2025
Copy of Deposition

Summary PW1 (witness Senthilkumar, age 57) was examined on oath on 24.06.2025 in O.S. 7/2024 before the Subordinate Judge, Mettupalayam. The witness testified regarding an agreement dated 31.01.2020 with a one-month duration, and stated that filing the suit three years after the agreement period ended was justified. Cross-examination by defendants 2 and 3 was completed with no further re-examination, and the witness's deposition was recorded and authenticated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary PW1 (witness Senthilkumar, age 57) was examined on oath on 24.06.2025 in O.S. 7/2024 before the Subordinate Judge, Mettupalayam. The witness testified regarding an agreement dated 31.01.2020 with a one-month duration, and stated that filing the suit three years after the agreement period ended was justified. Cross-examination by defendants 2 and 3 was completed with no further re-examination, and the witness's deposition was recorded and authenticated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Mettupalayam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case