Inspector of Police Sulthanpettai (Negamam) PS vs Rasamuthu Advocate - Mrs.M. Tamilselvi — 152/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279, 304(A). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 24th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNCB180052372024

Filing Number

5211/2024

Filing Date

29-Aug-2018

Registration No

152/2024

Registration Date

29-Aug-2018

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur

Judge

31-Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

Decision Date

24-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

14

Police Station

Sultanpettai Police Station

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279, 304(A)
Mp/1/2026 Classification : 294 Cr.pc Section Inspector of Police Sulthanpettai (Negamam) PS
Mp/2/2026 Classification : 311 Cr.pc Section Inspector of Police Sulthanpettai (Negamam) PS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police Sulthanpettai (Negamam) PS (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rasamuthu Advocate - Mrs.M. Tamilselvi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: CC No. 152 of 2024 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur acquitted accused Rasamuthu of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304-A (death by negligence), finding the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that he drove the motorcycle rash/negligently. The court noted absence of eyewitnesses to the actual accident, no evidence of excessive speed, and the postmortem report indicating death from myocardial infarction rather than direct accident injury, creating reasonable doubt about causation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  5. 21-Apr-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  6. 20-Apr-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  7. 20-Apr-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  8. 17-Apr-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  9. 16-Apr-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  10. 15-Apr-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  11. 15-Apr-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  12. 15-Apr-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  13. 09-Apr-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  14. 09-Apr-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  15. 23-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  16. 16-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  17. 16-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  18. 09-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  19. 04-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  20. 08-Jan-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  21. 15-Dec-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  22. 10-Dec-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  23. 01-Dec-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  24. 03-Nov-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  25. 15-Oct-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  26. 22-Sep-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  27. 25-Jun-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  28. 07-Apr-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  29. 06-Jan-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  30. 07-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 29-Aug-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 152/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC No. 152 of 2024 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur acquitted accused Rasamuthu of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304-A (death by negligence), finding the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that he drove the motorcycle rash/negligently. The court noted absence of eyewitnesses to the actual accident, no evidence of excessive speed, and the postmortem report indicating death from myocardial infarction rather than direct accident injury, creating reasonable doubt about causation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case