Inspector of Police Karumathampatty PS vs DIVAKAR — 902/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b), 118(1), 351(3). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 12th March 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNCB180045242025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

31-10-2025

Filing Number

4498/2025

Filing Date

31-10-2025

Registration No

902/2025

Registration Date

31-10-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur

Judge

31-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SULUR

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

504

Police Station

Karumathampatty Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b), 118(1), 351(3)
MP/1/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section Inspector of Police Karumathampatty PS
MP/2/2026 Classification : 320 Cr.PC Section Inspector of Police Karumathampatty PS

Petitioner(s)

Inspector of Police Karumathampatty PS (Police Station)

Adv. Inspector of Police Karumathampatty Police Station

Respondent(s)

DIVAKAR

Hearing History

Judge: 31-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SULUR

12-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Questioning

10-03-2026

Trial

09-03-2026

Trial

26-02-2026

Trial

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Court Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur acquitted Mr. Divakar of charges under Sections 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (assault, criminal intimidation, and criminal threat) for an alleged incident on November 3, 2024, at a TASMAC bar. The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, primarily because the principal witness (the alleged victim) turned hostile and did not support the prosecution's version, while other evidence was merely procedural in nature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Court Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur acquitted Mr. Divakar of charges under Sections 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (assault, criminal intimidation, and criminal threat) for an alleged incident on November 3, 2024, at a TASMAC bar. The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, primarily because the principal witness (the alleged victim) turned hostile and did not support the prosecution's version, while other evidence was merely procedural in nature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case