Inspector of Police Karumathampatty PS vs DIVAKAR — 902/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b), 118(1), 351(3). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 12th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCB180045242025
e-Filing Number
31-10-2025
Filing Number
4498/2025
Filing Date
31-10-2025
Registration No
902/2025
Registration Date
31-10-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur
Judge
31-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SULUR
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
504
Police Station
Karumathampatty Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police Karumathampatty PS (Police Station)
Adv. Inspector of Police Karumathampatty Police Station
Respondent(s)
DIVAKAR
Hearing History
Judge: 31-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SULUR
Disposed
Questioning
Trial
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 11-03-2026 | Questioning | |
| 10-03-2026 | Trial | |
| 09-03-2026 | Trial | |
| 26-02-2026 | Trial |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur acquitted Mr. Divakar of charges under Sections 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (assault, criminal intimidation, and criminal threat) for an alleged incident on November 3, 2024, at a TASMAC bar. The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, primarily because the principal witness (the alleged victim) turned hostile and did not support the prosecution's version, while other evidence was merely procedural in nature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur acquitted Mr. Divakar of charges under Sections 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (assault, criminal intimidation, and criminal threat) for an alleged incident on November 3, 2024, at a TASMAC bar. The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, primarily because the principal witness (the alleged victim) turned hostile and did not support the prosecution's version, while other evidence was merely procedural in nature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts