Nachimuthu vs Sugumaran — 934/2022

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 05-May-2026

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNCB180045042022

Filing Number

4499/2022

Filing Date

26-Oct-2022

Registration No

934/2022

Registration Date

26-Oct-2022

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur

Judge

31-Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142
Mp/1/2024 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Sugumaran
Mp/2/2024 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Nachimuthu
Mp/3/2024 Classification : 315 Cr.pc Section Nachimuthu
Mp/4/2024 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Nachimuthu
Mp/5/2024 Classification : 294 Cr.pc Section Nachimuthu
Mp/6/2024 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Nachimuthu
Mp/7/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Nachimuthu
Mp/9/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Nachimuthu
Mp/10/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Nachimuthu
Mp/11/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Nachimuthu
Mp/12/2025 Classification : 256 Cr.pc Section Nachimuthu
Mp/13/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Nachimuthu
Mp/14/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Nachimuthu
Mp/15/2025 Classification : 256 Cr.pc Section Nachimuthu
Mp/16/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Nachimuthu
Mp/17/2025 Classification : 256 Cr.pc Section Nachimuthu
Mp/18/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Nachimuthu
Mp/19/2025 Classification : 256 Cr.pc Section Nachimuthu
Mp/20/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Nachimuthu
Mp/21/2026 Classification : 256 Cr.pc Section Nachimuthu
Mp/22/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Nachimuthu
Mp/23/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Nachimuthu
Mp/24/2026 Classification : 256 Cr.pc Section Nachimuthu
Mp/25/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Nachimuthu
Mp/26/2026 Classification : 256 Cr.pc Section Nachimuthu
Mp/27/2026 Classification : 256 Cr.pc Section Nachimuthu
Mp/28/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Nachimuthu

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nachimuthu

    Adv. Karunamoorthy

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sugumaran

Case History

  1. 05-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur, allowed the petition filed by the accused under Section 294 Cr.P.C. (Section 330 BNSS), permitting him to produce and mark additional documents as exhibits in his defense for a cheque dishonor case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court held that procedural rules should not defeat substantive justice and that the accused's relevant documents (notices, replies, electronic evidence, and registered documents) were necessary for establishing his defense that no legally enforceable debt existed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  8. 23-Jan-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  9. 12-Dec-2025

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  10. 18-Nov-2025

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  11. 10-Oct-2025

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  12. 12-Sep-2025

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  13. 03-Sep-2025

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  14. 28-Aug-2025

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  15. 19-Aug-2025

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  16. 18-Aug-2025

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  17. 11-Aug-2025

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  18. 01-Aug-2025

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  19. 18-Jul-2025

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  20. 11-Jul-2025

    Cmp Pending

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  21. 17-Jun-2025

    Cmp Pending

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  22. 30-May-2025

    Cmp Pending

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  23. 25-Apr-2025

    Cmp Pending

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  24. 14-Mar-2025

    Cmp Pending

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  25. 28-Jan-2025

    Cmp Pending

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  26. 17-Dec-2024

    Cmp Pending

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  27. 05-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  28. 24-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  29. 05-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  30. 20-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  31. 16-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  32. 11-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  33. 26-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  34. 23-Feb-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  35. 23-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  36. 06-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  37. 09-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  38. 01-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  39. 07-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  40. 01-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  41. 09-May-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  42. 20-Apr-2023

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  43. 30-Mar-2023

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  44. 14-Mar-2023

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  45. 14-Mar-2023

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  46. 10-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  47. 10-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  48. 29-Dec-2022

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  49. 30-Nov-2022

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  50. 26-Oct-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  51. 26-Oct-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 934/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur, allowed the petition filed by the accused under Section 294 Cr.P.C. (Section 330 BNSS), permitting him to produce and mark additional documents as exhibits in his defense for a cheque dishonor case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court held that procedural rules should not defeat substantive justice and that the accused's relevant documents (notices, replies, electronic evidence, and registered documents) were necessary for establishing his defense that no legally enforceable debt existed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case