Ravikumar vs Ramesh — 637/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 142(c). Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 28th April 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCB180043342025

Case disposed

Filing Number

4311/2025

Filing Date

26-09-2025

Registration No

637/2025

Registration Date

26-09-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur

Judge

31-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SULUR

Decision Date

28th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 142(c)
Mp/1/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Ravikumar
Mp/2/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Ravikumar
Mp/3/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section RameshRavikumar
Mp/4/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Ravikumar

Petitioner(s)

Ravikumar

Respondent(s)

Ramesh

Hearing History

Judge: 31-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SULUR

28-04-2026

Disposed

02-04-2026

Compliance

26-03-2026

Orders

18-03-2026

Orders

16-03-2026

Orders

Interim Orders

02-04-2026
Copy of Order

Case Summary: Ravikumar v. Ramesh (CRL MP 637/2025) The Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur, allowed Ravikumar's petition seeking condonation of 261 days' delay in filing a cheque bounce complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found the petitioner's reasons—sudden illness and caring for aged parents—acceptable despite lack of documentary proof, holding that substantial justice should prevail over technical formalities. The delay was condoned on condition that the petitioner pay ₹5,000 costs to the respondent within two weeks, failing which the petition stands dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Ravikumar v. Ramesh (CRL MP 637/2025) The Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur, allowed Ravikumar's petition seeking condonation of 261 days' delay in filing a cheque bounce complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found the petitioner's reasons—sudden illness and caring for aged parents—acceptable despite lack of documentary proof, holding that substantial justice should prevail over technical formalities. The delay was condoned on condition that the petitioner pay ₹5,000 costs to the respondent within two weeks, failing which the petition stands dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case