M/s Best Tading Corporation Rep By Its Poa A Karuppaiya vs J Anitha Proprietor M/s Bakiyam And Co — 347/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: Service Pending-Warrant. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.

Service Pending-Warrant Next hearing 20-Jul-2026 in 1 week

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNCB180042872024

e-Filing Number

27-06-2024

Filing Number

4271/2024

Filing Date

06-Aug-2024

Registration No

347/2024

Registration Date

09-Sep-2024

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur

Judge

31-Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142
Code of Criminal Procedure Section 200
Mp/1/2024 Classification : 436 Cr.pc Section M/s Best Tading Corporation Rep By Its Poa A Karuppaiya
Mp/3/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section M/s Best Tading Corporation Rep By Its Poa A Karuppaiya
Mp/4/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section M/s Best Tading Corporation Rep By Its Poa A Karuppaiya
Mp/5/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section M/s Best Tading Corporation Rep By Its Poa A Karuppaiya
Mp/6/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section M/s Best Tading Corporation Rep By Its Poa A Karuppaiya
Mp/7/2026 Classification : 256 Cr.pc Section M/s Best Tading Corporation Rep By Its Poa A Karuppaiya

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/s Best Tading Corporation Rep By Its Poa A Karuppaiya

    Adv. k Prabhu Ram

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.J Anitha Proprietor M/s Bakiyam And Co

Case History

  1. 20-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-May-2026

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  5. 14-Mar-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  8. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  9. 19-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  10. 04-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  11. 18-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  12. 12-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  13. 11-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  14. 25-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  15. 13-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  16. 17-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  17. 14-Mar-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  18. 27-Dec-2024

    Lok Adalat

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  19. 12-Nov-2024

    Lok Adalat

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  20. 08-Oct-2024

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  21. 09-Sep-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    This document is a witness deposition form (Judicial Form No. 53) filed in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Sulur on September 9, 2024, in case STC 4271 of 2024. The witness Karuppaiya testified on behalf of the defence, submitting an affidavit based on his knowledge of the case facts and identifying six documentary exhibits including a public authority certificate, case file, review memo, company computer records, lawyer's notice, and postal acknowledgment. The deposition was recorded in accordance with the Oaths Act, 1969, with the witness's signature and the magistrate's endorsement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  22. 09-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 06-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 347/2024

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a witness deposition form (Judicial Form No. 53) filed in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Sulur on September 9, 2024, in case STC 4271 of 2024. The witness Karuppaiya testified on behalf of the defence, submitting an affidavit based on his knowledge of the case facts and identifying six documentary exhibits including a public authority certificate, case file, review memo, company computer records, lawyer's notice, and postal acknowledgment. The deposition was recorded in accordance with the Oaths Act, 1969, with the witness's signature and the magistrate's endorsement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case