Senthikumar vs Natarajan R — 403/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat on 14th March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNCB180017512025
e-Filing Number
02-05-2025
Filing Number
1748/2025
Filing Date
09-05-2025
Registration No
403/2025
Registration Date
15-05-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur
Judge
31-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SULUR
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Senthikumar
Adv. k Prabhu Ram
Respondent(s)
Natarajan R
Hearing History
Judge: 31-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SULUR
Disposed
Lok Adalat
Service Pending-Warrant
Service Pending-Warrant
Service Pending-Warrant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 03-02-2026 | Lok Adalat |
| 22-01-2026 | Service Pending-Warrant |
| 26-12-2025 | Service Pending-Warrant |
| 28-10-2025 | Service Pending-Warrant |
Interim Orders
This document is a witness deposition record (Judicial Form No. 53) from STC 403/2025 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur, dated 2 June 2025. Senthikumar (the petitioner) testified as PW-1 (defence witness), affirming under oath that he is the complainant/petitioner in the case and provided affidavit evidence supporting his side's claims. The court marked four documentary exhibits into evidence: the FIR dated 3 March 2025, a reply memo dated 4 March 2025, a lawyer's notice dated 19 March 2025, and a reply letter dated 21 March 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a witness deposition record (Judicial Form No. 53) from STC 403/2025 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur, dated 2 June 2025. Senthikumar (the petitioner) testified as PW-1 (defence witness), affirming under oath that he is the complainant/petitioner in the case and provided affidavit evidence supporting his side's claims. The court marked four documentary exhibits into evidence: the FIR dated 3 March 2025, a reply memo dated 4 March 2025, a lawyer's notice dated 19 March 2025, and a reply letter dated 21 March 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts