Inspector of Police ,Sulthanpettai vs Kanagaraj — 1124/2025
Case under Tn Gaming Act, 1930 Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--Conviction on 14th March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNCB180015262025
Filing Number
1523/2025
Filing Date
30-04-2025
Registration No
1124/2025
Registration Date
03-12-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur
Judge
31-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SULUR
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Conviction
FIR Details
FIR Number
119
Police Station
Sultanpettai Police Station
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police ,Sulthanpettai
Respondent(s)
Kanagaraj
Chandrasekar
Suriya Prakash
Vasanthakumar
Maran
Balan
Shanmugasundaram
Hearing History
Judge: 31-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SULUR
Disposed
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-01-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 12-12-2025 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 03-12-2025 | Service Pending-Summon |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur convicted all seven accused (Kanagaraj, Chandrasekar, Suriya Prakash, Vasanthakumar, Maran, Balan, and Shanmugasundaram) under Section 12 of the Tamil Nadu Gaming Act based on their voluntary admission. Each accused was fined Rs. 3,000 (total Rs. 21,000) with one month simple imprisonment as default punishment. Multiple vehicles and Rs. 8,100 in cash were confiscated; some vehicles were returned to owners while others remained in police custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur convicted all seven accused (Kanagaraj, Chandrasekar, Suriya Prakash, Vasanthakumar, Maran, Balan, and Shanmugasundaram) under Section 12 of the Tamil Nadu Gaming Act based on their voluntary admission. Each accused was fined Rs. 3,000 (total Rs. 21,000) with one month simple imprisonment as default punishment. Multiple vehicles and Rs. 8,100 in cash were confiscated; some vehicles were returned to owners while others remained in police custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts