Inspector of Police Sulur PS vs Rooban Isravel Advocate - TAMIL SELVI M — 413/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279, 304(A). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 09th September 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCB180014242025
Next Hearing
09th September 2026
Filing Number
1421/2025
Filing Date
23-04-2025
Registration No
413/2025
Registration Date
23-04-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur
Judge
31-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SULUR
FIR Details
FIR Number
513
Police Station
Sulur Police Station
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police Sulur PS (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
Rooban Isravel Advocate - TAMIL SELVI M
Hearing History
Judge: 31-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SULUR
Trial
Trial
Trial
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2026 | Trial |
| 30-04-2026 | Trial |
| 08-04-2026 | Trial |
| 16-03-2026 | Trial |
| 11-02-2026 | Trial |
Interim Orders
This document is a witness deposition record (Judicial Form No. 53) from Case CC 413/2025, Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur, dated April 30, 2026. Witness PW-2 (Velmurugan) testified regarding an accident on June 22, 2018, stating he visited the accident site and signed the police panchnama (investigation report) alongside relative Pichaimanam. During cross-examination, the witness clarified he read the document before signing and agreed to sign as a relative of Rajesh despite not visiting the accident site himself. The deposition was recorded and no re-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a witness deposition record (Judicial Form No. 53) from Case CC 413/2025, Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur, dated April 30, 2026. Witness PW-2 (Velmurugan) testified regarding an accident on June 22, 2018, stating he visited the accident site and signed the police panchnama (investigation report) alongside relative Pichaimanam. During cross-examination, the witness clarified he read the document before signing and agreed to sign as a relative of Rajesh despite not visiting the accident site himself. The deposition was recorded and no re-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts