Inspector of Police Sulur PS vs Duraisamy — 263/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 447, 506(2). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCB180010362025
Filing Number
1034/2025
Filing Date
04-Apr-2025
Registration No
263/2025
Registration Date
04-Apr-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur
Judge
31-Judicial Magistrate, Sulur
Last updated 18-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
381
Police Station
Sulur Police Station
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Inspector of Police Sulur PS (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
-
1.Duraisamy
-
2.Saraswathi
-
3.Nanthakumar
Case History
-
04-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Apr-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate, Sulur
-
11-Mar-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate, Sulur
-
21-Jan-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
This document is a deposition of witness (PW-1) recorded in Criminal Case No. 263 CC of 2025 before the Judicial Magistrate, Sulur on 21st January 2026. The witness testified about an incident on 30.04.2021 wherein the accused persons allegedly assaulted workers at his residence with sticks and stones, made threats, and used abusive language. The defence counsel was present and examination-in-chief and cross-examination were completed without further re-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Jan-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate, Sulur
-
10-Dec-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate, Sulur
-
03-Nov-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate, Sulur
-
15-Sep-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate, Sulur
-
31-Jul-2025
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate, Sulur
-
21-May-2025
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate, Sulur
-
04-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 263/2025
This document is a deposition of witness (PW-1) recorded in Criminal Case No. 263 CC of 2025 before the Judicial Magistrate, Sulur on 21st January 2026. The witness testified about an incident on 30.04.2021 wherein the accused persons allegedly assaulted workers at his residence with sticks and stones, made threats, and used abusive language. The defence counsel was present and examination-in-chief and cross-examination were completed without further re-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts