Rajagopalan vs Inspector of Police, Sulur PS — 262/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2). Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCB180006012026

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

591/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

262/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur

Judge

31-Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

618

Police Station

Sulur Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajagopalan

    Adv. Dharchana D

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, Sulur PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate Court at Sulur allowed the petition and granted interim custody of the seized Yamaha R15 motorcycle (Reg. No. TN-15-MC-6352) to the petitioner/owner, Mr. Rajagopalan, as the police did not object. The court imposed strict conditions including furnishing two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each, prohibition on sale/encumbrance until case disposal, submission of photographs with court attestation, and production of the vehicle as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 262/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate Court at Sulur allowed the petition and granted interim custody of the seized Yamaha R15 motorcycle (Reg. No. TN-15-MC-6352) to the petitioner/owner, Mr. Rajagopalan, as the police did not object. The court imposed strict conditions including furnishing two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each, prohibition on sale/encumbrance until case disposal, submission of photographs with court attestation, and production of the vehicle as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case