Inspector of Police Karumathampatty PS vs MODHILAL — 267/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497. Disposed: Uncontested--CLOSED on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCB180005682026

e-Filing Number

05-03-2026

Filing Number

558/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

267/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur

Judge

31-Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CLOSED

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

407

Police Station

Karumathampatty Police Station

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police Karumathampatty PS (Police Station)

    Adv. Inspector of Police Karumathampatty Police Station

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MODHILAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur allowed the police petition to destroy 1,111.56 kg of seized tobacco products under COTPA Act violations. The court found that since samples were already taken, videographed, and forensic analysis completed, destruction would cause no prejudice to either party. The court ordered safe destruction by Food Safety Department officials following prescribed procedures, citing natural decay risk and storage constraints as justification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Compliance

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Cmp Pending

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 267/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur allowed the police petition to destroy 1,111.56 kg of seized tobacco products under COTPA Act violations. The court found that since samples were already taken, videographed, and forensic analysis completed, destruction would cause no prejudice to either party. The court ordered safe destruction by Food Safety Department officials following prescribed procedures, citing natural decay risk and storage constraints as justification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case