Inspector of Police Karumathampatty PS vs MODHILAL — 267/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497. Disposed: Uncontested--CLOSED on 08th April 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCB180005682026
e-Filing Number
05-03-2026
Filing Number
558/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
267/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur
Judge
31-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SULUR
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CLOSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
407
Police Station
Karumathampatty Police Station
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police Karumathampatty PS (Police Station)
Adv. Inspector of Police Karumathampatty Police Station
Respondent(s)
MODHILAL
Hearing History
Judge: 31-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SULUR
Disposed
Compliance
CMP Pending
CMP Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 12-03-2026 | Compliance | |
| 10-03-2026 | CMP Pending | |
| 07-03-2026 | CMP Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur allowed the police petition to destroy 1,111.56 kg of seized tobacco products under COTPA Act violations. The court found that since samples were already taken, videographed, and forensic analysis completed, destruction would cause no prejudice to either party. The court ordered safe destruction by Food Safety Department officials following prescribed procedures, citing natural decay risk and storage constraints as justification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur allowed the police petition to destroy 1,111.56 kg of seized tobacco products under COTPA Act violations. The court found that since samples were already taken, videographed, and forensic analysis completed, destruction would cause no prejudice to either party. The court ordered safe destruction by Food Safety Department officials following prescribed procedures, citing natural decay risk and storage constraints as justification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts