Dhinesh vs Inspector of Police, Karumathampatty PS — 256/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCB180005492026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

04-03-2026

Filing Number

539/2026

Filing Date

04-03-2026

Registration No

256/2026

Registration Date

04-03-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur

Judge

31-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SULUR

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

90

Police Station

Karumathampatty Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

Dhinesh

Adv. Arunraj A

Sathish

Adv. Arunraj A

Respondent(s)

Inspector of Police, Karumathampatty PS (Police Station)

Hearing History

Judge: 31-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SULUR

10-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Enquiry

06-03-2026

CMP Pending

04-03-2026

CMP Pending

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Copy of Order

The Judicial Magistrate granted bail to two accused (Sathish and Dhinesh) charged with abuse, assault, and threats under BNS sections 118(1), 296(b), 303(2), and 351(3), considering their 9-day judicial custody, lack of prior antecedents, and the injured party's hospital discharge. The court imposed strict conditions including Rs. 10,000 bonds with sureties, daily police reporting for 30 days, and prohibitions on tampering with evidence or absconding, with breach liable to criminal action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate granted bail to two accused (Sathish and Dhinesh) charged with abuse, assault, and threats under BNS sections 118(1), 296(b), 303(2), and 351(3), considering their 9-day judicial custody, lack of prior antecedents, and the injured party's hospital discharge. The court imposed strict conditions including Rs. 10,000 bonds with sureties, daily police reporting for 30 days, and prohibitions on tampering with evidence or absconding, with breach liable to criminal action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case