M/s palladam chit fund, rep Natarajan vs M/s Srinivas and Co — 114/2021
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Enquiry. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCB180004952021
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
486/2021
Filing Date
01-10-2021
Registration No
114/2021
Registration Date
01-10-2021
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur
Judge
31-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SULUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/s palladam chit fund, rep Natarajan
Adv. Manikandan
Respondent(s)
M/s Srinivas and Co
Hearing History
Judge: 31-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SULUR
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
Judgement
Judgement
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Enquiry | |
| 02-04-2026 | Enquiry | |
| 27-03-2026 | Enquiry | |
| 23-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 16-03-2026 | Judgement |
Interim Orders
This is a Tamil language civil court order (C.C. No. 114/2021) from June 17, 2025, documenting cross-examination testimony in a CHIT fund dispute case. The witness testimony addresses conflicting claims regarding loan amounts, vouchers, promissory notes, and repayment obligations between a CHIT company and the defendant, with the court recording the witness's affirmations and denials on various procedural and factual matters. The order does not grant or dismiss the petition, but rather records the examination proceedings; however, it notes objections regarding statutory barring by limitation and whether the defendant is obligated to repay the claimed amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a Tamil language civil court order (C.C. No. 114/2021) from June 17, 2025, documenting cross-examination testimony in a CHIT fund dispute case. The witness testimony addresses conflicting claims regarding loan amounts, vouchers, promissory notes, and repayment obligations between a CHIT company and the defendant, with the court recording the witness's affirmations and denials on various procedural and factual matters. The order does not grant or dismiss the petition, but rather records the examination proceedings; however, it notes objections regarding statutory barring by limitation and whether the defendant is obligated to repay the claimed amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts