Prakash A (Bail) vs Inspector of Police, Neelambur PS — 252/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 11th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCB180004782026
e-Filing Number
24-02-2026
Filing Number
471/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
252/2026
Registration Date
02-Mar-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur
Judge
31-Judicial Magistrate, Sulur
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
Last updated 18-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
91
Police Station
Sulur Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Prakash A (Bail)
Adv. THILAGA M
Respondent(s)
-
1.Inspector of Police, Neelambur PS (Police Station)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur dismissed Prakash's bail petition under Section 480 BNSS 2023. The accused was charged with breaking into a shop and stealing wire coils and pipe fittings (Sections 331(4), 305(a) BNS). The court rejected bail citing the serious nature of the offense, the accused's nine previous criminal cases involving theft and burglary, risk of witness tampering, and potential absconding, despite the accused having spent 40 days in judicial custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate, Sulur
-
09-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Judicial Magistrate, Sulur
-
06-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Judicial Magistrate, Sulur
-
05-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Judicial Magistrate, Sulur
-
04-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Judicial Magistrate, Sulur
-
03-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 252/2026
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur dismissed Prakash's bail petition under Section 480 BNSS 2023. The accused was charged with breaking into a shop and stealing wire coils and pipe fittings (Sections 331(4), 305(a) BNS). The court rejected bail citing the serious nature of the offense, the accused's nine previous criminal cases involving theft and burglary, risk of witness tampering, and potential absconding, despite the accused having spent 40 days in judicial custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts