Prakash A (Bail) vs Inspector of Police, Neelambur PS — 252/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 11th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCB180004782026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

24-02-2026

Filing Number

471/2026

Filing Date

24-02-2026

Registration No

252/2026

Registration Date

02-03-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur

Judge

31-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SULUR

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

FIR Details

FIR Number

91

Police Station

Sulur Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

Prakash A (Bail)

Adv. THILAGA M

Respondent(s)

Inspector of Police, Neelambur PS (Police Station)

Hearing History

Judge: 31-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SULUR

11-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Enquiry

06-03-2026

Enquiry

05-03-2026

Enquiry

04-03-2026

Enquiry

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Copy of Order

Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur dismissed Prakash's bail petition under Section 480 BNSS 2023. The accused was charged with breaking into a shop and stealing wire coils and pipe fittings (Sections 331(4), 305(a) BNS). The court rejected bail citing the serious nature of the offense, the accused's nine previous criminal cases involving theft and burglary, risk of witness tampering, and potential absconding, despite the accused having spent 40 days in judicial custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur dismissed Prakash's bail petition under Section 480 BNSS 2023. The accused was charged with breaking into a shop and stealing wire coils and pipe fittings (Sections 331(4), 305(a) BNS). The court rejected bail citing the serious nature of the offense, the accused's nine previous criminal cases involving theft and burglary, risk of witness tampering, and potential absconding, despite the accused having spent 40 days in judicial custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case