M/s PEPS Industries Pvt Ltd, Rep by its Authorized Signatory, Mr Igneuis Amalraj vs M/s Shree Madhura Foams Rep by its Proprietor Mr Raja — 95/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNCB180001252025

e-Filing Number

08-01-2025

Filing Number

124/2025

Filing Date

10-Jan-2025

Registration No

95/2025

Registration Date

10-Feb-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur

Judge

31-Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223and395ofBNSS
Mp/1/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section M/s PEPS Industries Pvt Ltd, Rep by its Authorized Signatory, Mr Igneuis Amalraj
Mp/2/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section M/s PEPS Industries Pvt Ltd, Rep by its Authorized Signatory, Mr Igneuis Amalraj
Mp/5/2025 Classification : 256 Cr.pc Section M/s PEPS Industries Pvt Ltd, Rep by its Authorized Signatory, Mr Igneuis Amalraj
Mp/6/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section M/s PEPS Industries Pvt Ltd, Rep by its Authorized Signatory, Mr Igneuis Amalraj
Mp/7/2025 Classification : 256 Cr.pc Section M/s PEPS Industries Pvt Ltd, Rep by its Authorized Signatory, Mr Igneuis Amalraj
Mp/8/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section M/s PEPS Industries Pvt Ltd, Rep by its Authorized Signatory, Mr Igneuis Amalraj
Mp/9/2026 Classification : 256 Cr.pc Section M/s PEPS Industries Pvt Ltd, Rep by its Authorized Signatory, Mr Igneuis Amalraj

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/s PEPS Industries Pvt Ltd, Rep by its Authorized Signatory, Mr Igneuis Amalraj

    Adv. M Tamilselvi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/s Shree Madhura Foams Rep by its Proprietor Mr Raja

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  4. 06-Feb-2026

    Mediation

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  5. 02-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  6. 13-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  7. 01-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  8. 01-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  9. 17-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  10. 30-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  11. 28-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  12. 25-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  13. 10-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  14. 25-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  15. 14-Mar-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  16. 10-Feb-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    This document is a witness deposition form (Judicial Form No. 53) from the Judicial Magistrate Court in Sulur, filed on February 10, 2025. Mr. Ignesius Amalraj (the petitioner from PEPS Industries Pvt Ltd) testified as the first defense witness in miscellaneous case STC 124/2025, affirming under oath that he is the complainant/petitioner with knowledge of the case facts. The witness submitted an affidavit based on his personal information and marked eight documentary exhibits (case filings, postal records, confirmations, and correspondence) as defense evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  17. 10-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 10-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 95/2025

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a witness deposition form (Judicial Form No. 53) from the Judicial Magistrate Court in Sulur, filed on February 10, 2025. Mr. Ignesius Amalraj (the petitioner from PEPS Industries Pvt Ltd) testified as the first defense witness in miscellaneous case STC 124/2025, affirming under oath that he is the complainant/petitioner with knowledge of the case facts. The witness submitted an affidavit based on his personal information and marked eight documentary exhibits (case filings, postal records, confirmations, and correspondence) as defense evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case