Srinivasan A vs Rajesh kumar R — 106/2019

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 27-Apr-2026

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNCB180000952019

Filing Number

94/2019

Filing Date

22-Feb-2019

Registration No

106/2019

Registration Date

27-Apr-2019

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur

Judge

31-Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138
Mp/3/2025 Classification : 256 Cr.pc Section Srinivasan A
Mp/4/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Srinivasan A
Mp/5/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Srinivasan A
Mp/6/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Srinivasan A
Mp/7/2025 Classification : 311 Cr.pc Section Srinivasan A
Mp/9/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Srinivasan A
Mp/10/2025 Classification : 256 Cr.pc Section Srinivasan A
Mp/11/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Srinivasan A
Mp/12/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Srinivasan A
Mp/13/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Srinivasan A
Mp/14/2026 Classification : 256 Cr.pc Section Srinivasan A
Mp/15/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Srinivasan A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Srinivasan A

    Adv. Karthikaivelan.K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rajesh kumar R

Case History

  1. 27-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Summary In Civil Case No. 106/2019 dated 16.03.2026, the court recorded the cross-examination testimony of PW1 (witness Srinivasan). The witness denied allegations of receiving money from the opposing party and refuted claims that funds were given at his residence, stating he had no knowledge of the opponent's address and that the opponent had no reason to borrow money from him. The witness also denied involvement in any property transactions with the opponent and claimed to have returned Rs. 1.5 lakhs that he had borrowed from another party (Sudha). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  8. 09-Jan-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  9. 12-Dec-2025

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  10. 02-Dec-2025

    Counter

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  11. 18-Nov-2025

    Counter

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  12. 11-Nov-2025

    Counter

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  13. 28-Oct-2025

    Counter

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  14. 03-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  15. 25-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  16. 19-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  17. 28-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  18. 19-Aug-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  19. 19-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  20. 18-Jul-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  21. 18-Jul-2025

    Counter

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  22. 24-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  23. 23-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  24. 14-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  25. 10-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  26. 22-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  27. 04-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  28. 13-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  29. 12-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  30. 25-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  31. 21-May-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  32. 19-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  33. 08-Mar-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  34. 08-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  35. 09-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  36. 29-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  37. 24-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  38. 27-Oct-2023

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  39. 29-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  40. 22-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  41. 25-Jul-2023

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  42. 25-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  43. 27-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  44. 26-May-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  45. 28-Apr-2023

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  46. 24-Mar-2023

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  47. 24-Mar-2023

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  48. 07-Feb-2023

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  49. 20-Jan-2023

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  50. 13-Dec-2022

    317 Cr.PCView PDF

  51. 13-Dec-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  52. 24-Nov-2022

    317 Cr.PCView PDF

  53. 24-Nov-2022

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  54. 15-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  55. 01-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  56. 11-Oct-2022

    317 Cr.PCView PDF

  57. 11-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  58. 19-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  59. 01-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  60. 06-Aug-2022

    317 Cr.PCView PDF

  61. 06-Aug-2022

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  62. 22-Jul-2022

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  63. 23-Jun-2022

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  64. 20-May-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  65. 23-Mar-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  66. 24-Feb-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  67. 02-Feb-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  68. 21-Dec-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  69. 21-Sep-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  70. 12-Aug-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  71. 21-Jun-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  72. 19-May-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  73. 07-Apr-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  74. 02-Mar-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  75. 28-Jan-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  76. 15-Dec-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  77. 20-Oct-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  78. 08-Sep-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  79. 04-Aug-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  80. 04-Jul-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  81. 06-Jun-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  82. 22-Apr-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  83. 05-Mar-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  84. 18-Feb-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  85. 20-Jan-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  86. 17-Dec-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  87. 18-Nov-2019

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  88. 14-Oct-2019

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  89. 09-Sep-2019

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  90. 16-Jul-2019

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  91. 10-Jun-2019

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Sulur

  92. 30-May-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  93. 22-Feb-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 106/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In Civil Case No. 106/2019 dated 16.03.2026, the court recorded the cross-examination testimony of PW1 (witness Srinivasan). The witness denied allegations of receiving money from the opposing party and refuted claims that funds were given at his residence, stating he had no knowledge of the opponent's address and that the opponent had no reason to borrow money from him. The witness also denied involvement in any property transactions with the opponent and claimed to have returned Rs. 1.5 lakhs that he had borrowed from another party (Sudha). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case