Nataraj vs Vinit Kumar Tayal Advocate - S.Anand — 229/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCB170003002022
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
Filing Number
356/2022
Filing Date
22-12-2022
Registration No
229/2022
Registration Date
22-12-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Sulur
Judge
30-DISTRICT MUNSIF, SULUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nataraj
Adv. A.Rajesh
Respondent(s)
Vinit Kumar Tayal Advocate - S.Anand
Punit Tayal
Adv. R.Sarojini
Suresh Kumar Tayal
Adv. R.Banumathi
Hearing History
Judge: 30-DISTRICT MUNSIF, SULUR
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 01-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document is a cross-examination transcript from a civil case (A.S. No. 229/2022) before the District Munsif, Sulur, dated 10.04.2026. The witness (plaintiff) testified regarding disputed yarn purchases, security deposits, and allegations of defective goods supplied by defendants operating spinning units across three locations in Coimbatore district. The cross-examination extensively tested the witness's credibility on inconsistencies in his affidavit, the purpose of security deposits, and claims about defendants' misconduct, with no final judgment or order issued—only the completion of witness examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a cross-examination transcript from a civil case (A.S. No. 229/2022) before the District Munsif, Sulur, dated 10.04.2026. The witness (plaintiff) testified regarding disputed yarn purchases, security deposits, and allegations of defective goods supplied by defendants operating spinning units across three locations in Coimbatore district. The cross-examination extensively tested the witness's credibility on inconsistencies in his affidavit, the purpose of security deposits, and claims about defendants' misconduct, with no final judgment or order issued—only the completion of witness examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts