Nataraj vs Vinit Kumar Tayal Advocate - S.Anand — 229/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNCB170003002022

Evidence

Next Hearing

03rd June 2026

Filing Number

356/2022

Filing Date

22-12-2022

Registration No

229/2022

Registration Date

22-12-2022

Court

District Munsif Court, Sulur

Judge

30-DISTRICT MUNSIF, SULUR

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c)

Petitioner(s)

Nataraj

Adv. A.Rajesh

Respondent(s)

Vinit Kumar Tayal Advocate - S.Anand

Punit Tayal

Adv. R.Sarojini

Suresh Kumar Tayal

Adv. R.Banumathi

Hearing History

Judge: 30-DISTRICT MUNSIF, SULUR

29-04-2026

Evidence

20-04-2026

Evidence

10-04-2026

Evidence

01-04-2026

Evidence

18-03-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

10-04-2026
Copy of Deposition

This document is a cross-examination transcript from a civil case (A.S. No. 229/2022) before the District Munsif, Sulur, dated 10.04.2026. The witness (plaintiff) testified regarding disputed yarn purchases, security deposits, and allegations of defective goods supplied by defendants operating spinning units across three locations in Coimbatore district. The cross-examination extensively tested the witness's credibility on inconsistencies in his affidavit, the purpose of security deposits, and claims about defendants' misconduct, with no final judgment or order issued—only the completion of witness examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a cross-examination transcript from a civil case (A.S. No. 229/2022) before the District Munsif, Sulur, dated 10.04.2026. The witness (plaintiff) testified regarding disputed yarn purchases, security deposits, and allegations of defective goods supplied by defendants operating spinning units across three locations in Coimbatore district. The cross-examination extensively tested the witness's credibility on inconsistencies in his affidavit, the purpose of security deposits, and claims about defendants' misconduct, with no final judgment or order issued—only the completion of witness examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Sulur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case