Sivaranjani Senthilvelan vs N.Kanakarajan Advocate - P.Rajendran — 148/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNCB170002192023

Arguments

Next Hearing

23rd March 2026

Filing Number

219/2023

Filing Date

19-12-2023

Registration No

148/2023

Registration Date

19-12-2023

Court

District Munsif Court, Sulur

Judge

30-DISTRICT MUNSIF, SULUR

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c)

Petitioner(s)

Sivaranjani Senthilvelan

Adv. A.Arun

Respondent(s)

N.Kanakarajan Advocate - P.Rajendran

Hearing History

Judge: 30-DISTRICT MUNSIF, SULUR

16-03-2026

Arguments

06-03-2026

Evidence

02-03-2026

Evidence

25-02-2026

Evidence

20-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

20-11-2024
Copy of Order
20-11-2024
Copy of Order
20-11-2024
Copy of Order
20-11-2024
Copy of Order
16-03-2026
Copy of Deposition

This is a cross-examination record in a civil case (A.V. No. 148/2023) from Sulur District Munsif Court, dated 16.03.2026. The document records the defendant's testimony regarding a commercial space rental dispute involving ₹5,50,000 in advance and ₹55,000 monthly rent, where the plaintiff allegedly failed to operate the business for 5 months. The defendant denies providing promised facilities as grounds for contract termination and claims to have re-let the space to another company (Meccanotecnica India Pvt. Ltd) on 21.08.2023. No final judgment is rendered in this excerpt—it is merely the testimony transcript acknowledged by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a cross-examination record in a civil case (A.V. No. 148/2023) from Sulur District Munsif Court, dated 16.03.2026. The document records the defendant's testimony regarding a commercial space rental dispute involving ₹5,50,000 in advance and ₹55,000 monthly rent, where the plaintiff allegedly failed to operate the business for 5 months. The defendant denies providing promised facilities as grounds for contract termination and claims to have re-let the space to another company (Meccanotecnica India Pvt. Ltd) on 21.08.2023. No final judgment is rendered in this excerpt—it is merely the testimony transcript acknowledged by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Sulur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case