Nirmal Rose Sindhiya vs The President — 130/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Disposed: Uncontested--Decreed without cost on 27th April 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNCB170001572024

Filing Number

159/2024

Filing Date

16-Oct-2024

Registration No

130/2024

Registration Date

17-Oct-2024

Court

District Munsif Court, Sulur

Judge

30-District Munsif, Sulur

Decision Date

27-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Decreed without cost

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nirmal Rose Sindhiya

    Adv. Vanaja.J

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The President

  2. 2.The Tahsildar

  3. 3.The Block Development Officer

  4. 4.The District Collector

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    Copy of DecreeView PDF

    Case Summary: 130/2024 The District Civil Court in Sulur granted a permanent injunction in favor of petitioner Nirmal Rose Sindhiya, restraining the respondents (Panchayat Chairman, Tahsildar, and Block Development Officer) from carrying out any construction or unauthorized activities on the petitioner's agricultural land located in Kannambamiyam village without legal permission. The court valued the subject property at ₹48,600 and directed each party to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif, Sulur

  5. 24-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif, Sulur

  6. 20-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif, Sulur

  7. 15-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif, Sulur

  8. 07-Apr-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  9. 07-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif, Sulur

  10. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  11. 16-Mar-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif, Sulur

  12. 24-Feb-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif, Sulur

  13. 24-Feb-2026

    Restored

    District Munsif, Sulur

  14. 24-Feb-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif, Sulur

  15. 06-Nov-2025

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  16. 06-Nov-2025

    Disposed

    District Munsif, Sulur

  17. 14-Oct-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif, Sulur

  18. 23-Sep-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif, Sulur

  19. 08-Sep-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif, Sulur

  20. 14-Aug-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif, Sulur

  21. 05-Aug-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif, Sulur

  22. 04-Jul-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif, Sulur

  23. 26-Jun-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Sulur

  24. 16-Jun-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Sulur

  25. 06-Jun-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Sulur

  26. 08-Apr-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Sulur

  27. 10-Mar-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Sulur

  28. 10-Jan-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Sulur

  29. 20-Dec-2024

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif, Sulur

  30. 27-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 16-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 130/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 130/2024 The District Civil Court in Sulur granted a permanent injunction in favor of petitioner Nirmal Rose Sindhiya, restraining the respondents (Panchayat Chairman, Tahsildar, and Block Development Officer) from carrying out any construction or unauthorized activities on the petitioner's agricultural land located in Kannambamiyam village without legal permission. The court valued the subject property at ₹48,600 and directed each party to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case