L.Palanisamy vs R.Thirumurthy Advocate - Chinnasamy A C — 93/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Status: Stay. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCB170001342019
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
132/2019
Filing Date
31-07-2019
Registration No
93/2019
Registration Date
31-07-2019
Court
District Munsif Court, Sulur
Judge
30-DISTRICT MUNSIF, SULUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
L.Palanisamy
Adv. Viswanathan.R
K.Parvathi
Adv. Viswanathan.R
M.Janaki
Adv. Viswanathan.R
Ragupathi
Adv. Viswanathan.R
Respondent(s)
R.Thirumurthy Advocate - Chinnasamy A C
R.Sivakumar
Adv. A.Chinnasamy
A.S.Pongodi
Adv. A.Chinnasamy
T.Latha
Adv. A.Chinnasamy
Hearing History
Judge: 30-DISTRICT MUNSIF, SULUR
Stay
Stay
Stay
Stay
Stay
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-06-2026 | Stay |
| 24-04-2026 | Stay |
| 06-04-2026 | Stay |
| 16-03-2026 | Stay |
| 25-02-2026 | Stay |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S.No.93/2019 Outcome: The petition to amend the plaint was allowed with no costs awarded. The court permitted the plaintiffs to add a new allegation of trespassing and property damage (fencing worth Rs.89,325) caused by defendants, increasing the total claim value to Rs.94,325 with 12% annual interest from amendment date until realization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S.No.93/2019 Outcome: The petition to amend the plaint was allowed with no costs awarded. The court permitted the plaintiffs to add a new allegation of trespassing and property damage (fencing worth Rs.89,325) caused by defendants, increasing the total claim value to Rs.94,325 with 12% annual interest from amendment date until realization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts