Murugan vs Radhamani Advocate - Muralidharan.T — 92/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCB170001082020
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
108/2020
Filing Date
18-08-2020
Registration No
92/2020
Registration Date
21-08-2020
Court
District Munsif Court, Sulur
Judge
30-DISTRICT MUNSIF, SULUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Murugan
Adv. Krishnaveni R
Jayamani
Adv. Krishnaveni R
Respondent(s)
Radhamani Advocate - Muralidharan.T
Hearing History
Judge: 30-DISTRICT MUNSIF, SULUR
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-06-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 04-06-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 29-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 24-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 18-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS.No.92/2020 Petitioners Murugan and Jayamani filed a petition under Order 9 Rule 9 and Section 151 CPC to restore Interim Application No.10/2025, which had been dismissed for default on 05.08.2025. The District Munsif Court of Sulur allowed the petition on 10.04.2026, restoring the dismissed interim application. No costs were imposed on either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS.No.92/2020 Petitioners Murugan and Jayamani filed a petition under Order 9 Rule 9 and Section 151 CPC to restore Interim Application No.10/2025, which had been dismissed for default on 05.08.2025. The District Munsif Court of Sulur allowed the petition on 10.04.2026, restoring the dismissed interim application. No costs were imposed on either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts