S.Periyasamy vs Sengodappan Advocate - Devisaravanan.P — 79/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 09th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCB170000972022
Filing Number
97/2022
Filing Date
13-Apr-2022
Registration No
79/2022
Registration Date
21-Apr-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Sulur
Judge
30-District Munsif, Sulur
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.S.Periyasamy
Adv. Alagarraj.G
-
2.P.Jothimani
Adv. Alagarraja.G
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sengodappan Advocate - Devisaravanan.P
-
2.Ganesan
Adv. Devisaravanan.P
-
3.Ponnusamy
Adv. Devisaravanan.P
-
4.Balasubramaniam
Adv. Devisaravanan.P
-
5.Thamaraikannan
Adv. Devisaravanan.P
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The District Munsif of Sulur dismissed the suit filed by S. Periyasamy and P. Jothimani for permanent injunction against defendants Sengodappan, Ganesan, Ponnusamy, Balasubramaniam, and Thamaraikannan for default. The plaintiffs failed to appear at the final hearing, provided no representation, and despite multiple opportunities, were not ready for trial, prompting the court to dismiss the case in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Disposed
District Munsif, Sulur
-
26-Mar-2026
Trial
District Munsif, Sulur
-
14-Mar-2026
Trial
District Munsif, Sulur
-
05-Mar-2026
Lok Adalat
District Munsif, Sulur
-
25-Feb-2026
Compromise
District Munsif, Sulur
-
11-Feb-2026
Trial
District Munsif, Sulur
-
04-Feb-2026
Trial
District Munsif, Sulur
-
23-Jan-2026
Trial
District Munsif, Sulur
-
08-Jan-2026
Trial
District Munsif, Sulur
-
05-Dec-2025
Trial
District Munsif, Sulur
-
28-Oct-2025
Mediation
District Munsif, Sulur
-
18-Sep-2025
Mediation
District Munsif, Sulur
-
14-Aug-2025
Mediation
District Munsif, Sulur
-
07-Jul-2025
Mediation
District Munsif, Sulur
-
31-Mar-2025
Trial
District Munsif, Sulur
-
20-Dec-2024
Trial
District Munsif, Sulur
-
28-Jun-2024
Trial
District Munsif, Sulur
-
31-Jan-2024
Trial
District Munsif, Sulur
-
30-Oct-2023
Trial
District Munsif, Sulur
-
19-Oct-2023
Issues
District Munsif, Sulur
-
10-Oct-2023
IA Pending
District Munsif, Sulur
-
23-Sep-2023
IA Pending
District Munsif, Sulur
-
21-Sep-2023
Issues
District Munsif, Sulur
-
04-Sep-2023
Issues
District Munsif, Sulur
-
28-Aug-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif, Sulur
-
14-Aug-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif, Sulur
-
27-Jul-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif, Sulur
-
16-Jun-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif, Sulur
-
31-Mar-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif, Sulur
-
24-Feb-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif, Sulur
-
23-Jan-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif, Sulur
-
19-Jan-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif, Sulur
-
18-Jan-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif, Sulur
-
15-Dec-2022
Written Statement
District Munsif, Sulur
-
17-Nov-2022
Written Statement
District Munsif, Sulur
-
31-Oct-2022
Written Statement
District Munsif, Sulur
-
29-Sep-2022
Written Statement
District Munsif, Sulur
-
20-Sep-2022
Written Statement
District Munsif, Sulur
-
02-Sep-2022
Written Statement
District Munsif, Sulur
-
25-Aug-2022
Written Statement
District Munsif, Sulur
-
12-Aug-2022
Written Statement
District Munsif, Sulur
-
27-Jun-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Apr-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 79/2022
The District Munsif of Sulur dismissed the suit filed by S. Periyasamy and P. Jothimani for permanent injunction against defendants Sengodappan, Ganesan, Ponnusamy, Balasubramaniam, and Thamaraikannan for default. The plaintiffs failed to appear at the final hearing, provided no representation, and despite multiple opportunities, were not ready for trial, prompting the court to dismiss the case in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts