K.V.Kuppusamy vs K.Velusamy Advocate - Muralidharan.B — 72/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCB170000852020
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
85/2020
Filing Date
24-06-2020
Registration No
72/2020
Registration Date
30-06-2020
Court
District Munsif Court, Sulur
Judge
30-DISTRICT MUNSIF, SULUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K.V.Kuppusamy
Adv. Mahesan.R
Respondent(s)
K.Velusamy Advocate - Muralidharan.B
K.Kandasamy
Adv. Muralidharan.B
K.Rameshkumar
Adv. Muralidharan.B
K.Maheshkumar
Adv. Muralidharan.B
V.Rajendran
Adv. Muralidharan.B
N.Krishnasami
V.Padmanabhan
P.Neeladevi
R.T.Anitharani
Adv. Muralidharan.B
R.Preethiviraj
G.Sridhar
R.Krishnakumar
Adv. Muralidharan.B
R.Vatshala
Adv. Muralidharan.B
S.Hemalatha
R.Haridas
Sangeetha
Adv. Muralidharan.B
L.Subramanian
Adv. Muralidharan.B
G.Ayyavu
Adv. Muralidharan.B
E.Thilagam
Adv. Muralidharan.B
S.Gokularaman
Adv. Muralidharan.B
Sivabrindha Gokularaman
Adv. Muralidharan.B
S.Uma Maheswari
Adv. Muralidharan.B
M.Loganathan
Adv. Muralidharan.B
Punitha
R.Sangeetha
S.Karthikeyan
S.Sambathkumar
M.Palaniappan
V.Valarmathi
Sathyabharathi
Adv. Muralidharan.B
K.Rajendran
Adv. Muralidharan.B
P. Sri Latha
Balaji Arumugam
Lalithakala Samundeswari
P.Uma Maheswari
Adv. Muralidharan.B
D.Mahalakshmi
S.Thangavel
Adv. Muralidharan.B
M.Sri Ranjani
R.Sathishkumar
G.Rohini
K.Kalaivani
V.Ananthakumar
K.Nagarajan
Adv. Muralidharan.B
Premkumar Raju
M.Arivukarasi
K.Navaneethan
Adv. Muralidharan.B
S.Masilamani
N.Sivasankar
N.Pushpalatha
Adv. Muralidharan.B
M.Banureka
Adv. Muralidharan.B
Hearing History
Judge: 30-DISTRICT MUNSIF, SULUR
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 04-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 03-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 29-04-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 72/2020 (K.V.Kuppusamy v. K.Velusamy Advocate and others) The District Munsif Court at Sulur issued an order on 30.01.2024 addressing a civil dispute. The court examined evidence and legal provisions including CrPC Section 179 and the Indian Penal Code (1986), ultimately finding certain documentary evidence admissible and evaluating the parties' respective claims. The court held that the petitioner failed to establish sufficient grounds for the relief sought and dismissed the petition accordingly, while directing certain procedural requirements to be fulfilled and providing directives regarding further proceedings in the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 72/2020 (K.V.Kuppusamy v. K.Velusamy Advocate and others) The District Munsif Court at Sulur issued an order on 30.01.2024 addressing a civil dispute. The court examined evidence and legal provisions including CrPC Section 179 and the Indian Penal Code (1986), ultimately finding certain documentary evidence admissible and evaluating the parties' respective claims. The court held that the petitioner failed to establish sufficient grounds for the relief sought and dismissed the petition accordingly, while directing certain procedural requirements to be fulfilled and providing directives regarding further proceedings in the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts