D.Susiladevi vs Elumalai Advocate - Thiyagarajan.M — 48/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Disposed: Contested--Decreed without cost on 30th April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNCB170000602022

Case disposed

Filing Number

60/2022

Filing Date

24-02-2022

Registration No

48/2022

Registration Date

01-03-2022

Court

District Munsif Court, Sulur

Judge

30-DISTRICT MUNSIF, SULUR

Decision Date

30th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Decreed without cost

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c)

Petitioner(s)

D.Susiladevi

Adv. Jayakumar.A

Respondent(s)

Elumalai Advocate - Thiyagarajan.M

Hearing History

Judge: 30-DISTRICT MUNSIF, SULUR

30-04-2026

Disposed

28-04-2026

Judgement

22-04-2026

Judgement

20-04-2026

Arguments

18-04-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

30-04-2026
Copy of Decree

Case Summary: D. Susiladevi v. Elumalai Advocate - Thiyagarajan.M (48/2022) The District Court in Choolur granted petitioner D. Susiladevi's suit for mandatory and perpetual injunctions regarding a shared pathway on her property in Karpaka Vinayak Nagar, Coimbatore. The court ordered the respondent to demolish a 6-foot-wide, 30-foot-long boundary wall and steps constructed on the common pathway within two months, and issued a perpetual injunction restraining the respondent and his representatives from obstructing the petitioner's use of the pathway. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: D. Susiladevi v. Elumalai Advocate - Thiyagarajan.M (48/2022) The District Court in Choolur granted petitioner D. Susiladevi's suit for mandatory and perpetual injunctions regarding a shared pathway on her property in Karpaka Vinayak Nagar, Coimbatore. The court ordered the respondent to demolish a 6-foot-wide, 30-foot-long boundary wall and steps constructed on the common pathway within two months, and issued a perpetual injunction restraining the respondent and his representatives from obstructing the petitioner's use of the pathway. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Sulur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case