Selvam vs Balamani Advocate - Chitra.D — 35/2022
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 25(b),25(d),25(c). Status: Additional Written Statement. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCB170000492022
Next Hearing
01st June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
49/2022
Filing Date
14-02-2022
Registration No
35/2022
Registration Date
15-02-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Sulur
Judge
30-DISTRICT MUNSIF, SULUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Selvam
Adv. Radhakrishnan.S
K.Karuppasami
Adv. Radhakrishnan.S
Sundaram
Adv. Radhakrishnan.S
Sabapathi
Adv. Radhakrishnan.S
Sowndarraj
Adv. Radhakrishnan.S
Anbalagan
Adv. Radhakrishnan.S
Murugan
Adv. Radhakrishnan.S
Respondent(s)
Balamani Advocate - Chitra.D
Thayammal
Adv. Chitra.D
Kanniammal
Adv. Chitra.D
Sumathi
Adv. Arunachallam.R
G.Palanisamy
The Sub-Registrar
Adv. Govt. Pleader
The Revenue Officer
Adv. Govt. Pleader
The Tahsildar
Adv. Govt. Pleader
P.Senthil
Adv. Arunachallam.R
Hearing History
Judge: 30-DISTRICT MUNSIF, SULUR
Additional Written Statement
Additional Written Statement
Additional Issues
Written Statement
Additional Written Statement
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Additional Written Statement | |
| 15-04-2026 | Additional Written Statement | |
| 06-04-2026 | Additional Issues | |
| 18-03-2026 | Written Statement | |
| 10-03-2026 | Additional Written Statement |
Interim Orders
Summary: The District Civil Court, Sulur allowed an Interlocutory Application (I.A. No. 12/2025) filed under CPC Order 1 Rule 10(2) and Section 151, permitting the petitioner S.A. Palanichami to be added as a defendant in Original Suit No. 35/2022. The court found merit in the application after hearing arguments from all counsel and examining the documents. No court fee was imposed on the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The District Civil Court, Sulur allowed an Interlocutory Application (I.A. No. 12/2025) filed under CPC Order 1 Rule 10(2) and Section 151, permitting the petitioner S.A. Palanichami to be added as a defendant in Original Suit No. 35/2022. The court found merit in the application after hearing arguments from all counsel and examining the documents. No court fee was imposed on the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts