Maheshwari vs Shriram city union Finance Limited — 25/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

Judgement Next hearing 05-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNCB170000392026

Filing Number

39/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

25/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

District Munsif Court, Sulur

Judge

30-District Munsif, Sulur

Last updated 18-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Maheshwari

    Adv. Kaleeswer.A

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shriram city union Finance Limited

Case History

  1. 05-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif, Sulur

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Summary: This is a witness deposition order from the District Munsif Court of Sulur in Original Case No. 25/2026. The witness (Tmt. A. Santhi, Assistant) was solemnly affirmed on 24.04.2026 and testified as the plaintiff, submitting written examination-in-chief with supporting documents (purchase deed from 2012, agreement from 2015, and court execution petition from 2017). The case has been adjourned to allow for cross-examination by the defendant's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif, Sulur

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif, Sulur

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 25/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: This is a witness deposition order from the District Munsif Court of Sulur in Original Case No. 25/2026. The witness (Tmt. A. Santhi, Assistant) was solemnly affirmed on 24.04.2026 and testified as the plaintiff, submitting written examination-in-chief with supporting documents (purchase deed from 2012, agreement from 2015, and court execution petition from 2017). The case has been adjourned to allow for cross-examination by the defendant's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case