K.Ramesh vs S.Sangeetha Advocate - M/s.Panchapakesan Associates — 27/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 06th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCB170000392023
Filing Number
39/2023
Filing Date
04-03-2023
Registration No
27/2023
Registration Date
04-03-2023
Court
District Munsif Court, Sulur
Judge
30-DISTRICT MUNSIF, SULUR
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K.Ramesh
Adv. Muralidharan.B
Respondent(s)
S.Sangeetha Advocate - M/s.Panchapakesan Associates
S.Savitha
Adv. M/s.Panchapakesan
S.Sathya
Adv. M/s.Panchapakesan
Hearing History
Judge: 30-DISTRICT MUNSIF, SULUR
Disposed
Trial
Trial
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-02-2026 | Trial |
| 09-02-2026 | Trial |
| 27-01-2026 | Trial |
| 06-12-2025 | Trial |
Interim Orders
The District Munsif Court in Sulur dismissed K. Ramesh's petition seeking a temporary injunction to restrain the three respondents from disturbing his right to use a cart track as an easement of necessity and easement of grant. The court found insufficient grounds to grant the interim relief and dismissed the petition without awarding costs to either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The District Munsif Court in Sulur dismissed K. Ramesh's petition seeking a temporary injunction to restrain the three respondents from disturbing his right to use a cart track as an easement of necessity and easement of grant. The court found insufficient grounds to grant the interim relief and dismissed the petition without awarding costs to either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts