A.Kuttiammal vs P.Thangavel Advocate - Nagarajan.R — 5/2021

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 27(c). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNCB170000042021

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Next Hearing

28th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

4/2021

Filing Date

08-01-2021

Registration No

5/2021

Registration Date

11-01-2021

Court

District Munsif Court, Sulur

Judge

30-DISTRICT MUNSIF, SULUR

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section 27(c)

Petitioner(s)

A.Kuttiammal

Adv. Gopalakrishnan.E, Gopalakrishnan.E

A.Rajeswari

Adv. Gopalakrishnan.E,Gopalakrishnan.E

A.Ramesh

Adv. Gopalakrishnan.E,Gopalakrishnan.E

Respondent(s)

P.Thangavel Advocate - Nagarajan.R

T.Prabhu

Hearing History

Judge: 30-DISTRICT MUNSIF, SULUR

24-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

20-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

16-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

09-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

07-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Interim Orders

20-01-2026
Copy of Order
20-01-2026
Copy of Order
20-01-2026
Copy of Order
20-01-2026
Copy of Order
10-03-2026
Copy of Deposition

This is a cross-examination statement recorded on 10.03.2026 in a civil property dispute (Case A.V.No. 5/2021) before the District Munsif at Sulur, where the defendant (respondent) denies the plaintiff's claims regarding unauthorized occupation of property plot no. 956/3. The defendant asserts that he did not encroach on the plaintiff's land and disputes the plaintiff's characterization of his construction, with no further order or adjournment decision documented in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a cross-examination statement recorded on 10.03.2026 in a civil property dispute (Case A.V.No. 5/2021) before the District Munsif at Sulur, where the defendant (respondent) denies the plaintiff's claims regarding unauthorized occupation of property plot no. 956/3. The defendant asserts that he did not encroach on the plaintiff's land and disputes the plaintiff's characterization of his construction, with no further order or adjournment decision documented in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Sulur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case