Si Of Police Valparai Ps vs Najeeb, S/o Kunjumakkar — 19/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 25th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCB150010772025
e-Filing Number
05-07-2025
Filing Number
1042/2025
Filing Date
11-07-2025
Registration No
19/2025
Registration Date
11-07-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Valparai
Judge
1-DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
136
Police Station
Valparai police station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Si Of Police Valparai Ps (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
Najeeb, S/o Kunjumakkar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 17-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The District Court at Valparai acquitted the accused under Section 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) for alleged ATM card fraud, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that witness testimonies contained significant contradictions and inconsistencies—particularly regarding the confessional statement's reliability and the chain of custody of recovered materials—making it impossible to establish guilt with certainty. Accordingly, the accused was discharged and released under Section 271(1) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The District Court at Valparai acquitted the accused under Section 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) for alleged ATM card fraud, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that witness testimonies contained significant contradictions and inconsistencies—particularly regarding the confessional statement's reliability and the chain of custody of recovered materials—making it impossible to establish guilt with certainty. Accordingly, the accused was discharged and released under Section 271(1) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts