SI OF POLICE MUDIS PS vs Petchimuthu — 19/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),118(1)BNS. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNCB150004062025
Next Hearing
25th May 2026
e-Filing Number
21-02-2025
Filing Number
398/2025
Filing Date
25-02-2025
Registration No
19/2025
Registration Date
25-02-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Valparai
Judge
1-DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
FIR Details
FIR Number
10
Police Station
Mudis Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI OF POLICE MUDIS PS (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
Petchimuthu
Hearing History
Judge: 1-DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 22-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a witness deposition document (not a final court order) from the Valpurai District Court recording testimony in case STC.No.19/2025 dated 11-03-2026. Two witnesses testified regarding an alleged assault by the accused Pechimuththu on 29-10-2024: the first witness (a 66-year-old laborer) and his wife (a 65-year-old housewife) described being beaten with a bamboo stick with an iron grip while defending their grandson. Both witnesses received injuries and were treated at government hospitals. The defense did not cross-examine the witnesses, and the depositions were admitted as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a witness deposition document (not a final court order) from the Valpurai District Court recording testimony in case STC.No.19/2025 dated 11-03-2026. Two witnesses testified regarding an alleged assault by the accused Pechimuththu on 29-10-2024: the first witness (a 66-year-old laborer) and his wife (a 65-year-old housewife) described being beaten with a bamboo stick with an iron grip while defending their grandson. Both witnesses received injuries and were treated at government hospitals. The defense did not cross-examine the witnesses, and the depositions were admitted as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts