M/s The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd, Mudis Rep.Group Manager vs Manivannan — 13/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section UO21R1(2). Status: Enquiry. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

Enquiry Next hearing 09-Jun-2026 this date has passed

EP - Execution Petition

CNR: TNCB150003902022

Filing Number

54/2022

Filing Date

28-Oct-2022

Registration No

13/2022

Registration Date

28-Oct-2022

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Valparai

Judge

1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section UO21R1(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/s The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd, Mudis Rep.Group Manager

    Adv. T.Paulpandi, B.A.,B.L.,Ms.No.658/1994

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Manivannan

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Enquiry

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Enquiry

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    Enquiry

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  8. 03-Feb-2026

    Enquiry

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  9. 20-Jan-2026

    Enquiry

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  10. 09-Jan-2026

    Enquiry

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  11. 02-Dec-2025

    Enquiry

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  12. 18-Nov-2025

    Enquiry

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  13. 14-Oct-2025

    Enquiry

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  14. 23-Sep-2025

    Enquiry

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  15. 09-Sep-2025

    Enquiry

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  16. 02-Sep-2025

    Enquiry

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  17. 19-Aug-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  18. 19-Aug-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The petition filed by S.M. Manivannan seeking to stay execution proceedings in original suit case No. 176/2012 has been dismissed. The court found that the petitioner failed to satisfy the mandatory requirements under Order 21 Rule 26 CPC, as no appeal or stay application was filed before the trial court or appellate court despite having 5+ years since the original judgment. The court upheld that execution stay orders under CPC Rule 26 are only meant to provide reasonable time for judgment-debtors to approach higher forums, not indefinite stay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  19. 19-Aug-2025

    Enquiry

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  20. 19-Aug-2025

    Restored

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  21. 19-Aug-2025

    Disposed

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  22. 05-Aug-2025

    Orders

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  23. 29-Jul-2025

    Orders

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  24. 15-Jul-2025

    Appearance

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  25. 25-Jun-2025

    Appearance

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  26. 20-Jun-2025

    Appearance

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  27. 12-Jun-2025

    Appearance

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  28. 02-Jun-2025

    Appearance

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  29. 16-Apr-2025

    Appearance

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  30. 18-Mar-2025

    Appearance

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  31. 18-Feb-2025

    Appearance

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  32. 31-Jan-2025

    Appearance

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  33. 09-Jan-2025

    Appearance

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  34. 19-Dec-2024

    Appearance

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  35. 13-Dec-2024

    Appearance

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  36. 10-Dec-2024

    Appearance

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  37. 25-Nov-2024

    Appearance

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  38. 11-Nov-2024

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  39. 18-Oct-2024

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  40. 09-Sep-2024

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  41. 22-Aug-2024

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  42. 25-Jul-2024

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  43. 24-Jun-2024

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  44. 25-Apr-2024

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  45. 26-Feb-2024

    Enquiry

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  46. 31-Jan-2024

    Enquiry

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  47. 30-Nov-2023

    Enquiry

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  48. 31-Oct-2023

    Enquiry

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  49. 30-Aug-2023

    Enquiry

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  50. 26-Jun-2023

    Enquiry

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  51. 26-Apr-2023

    Enquiry

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  52. 29-Mar-2023

    Enquiry

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  53. 10-Mar-2023

    Enquiry

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  54. 06-Mar-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  55. 03-Feb-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  56. 13-Jan-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  57. 23-Dec-2022

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  58. 09-Dec-2022

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  59. 25-Nov-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  60. 28-Oct-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 13/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The petition filed by S.M. Manivannan seeking to stay execution proceedings in original suit case No. 176/2012 has been dismissed. The court found that the petitioner failed to satisfy the mandatory requirements under Order 21 Rule 26 CPC, as no appeal or stay application was filed before the trial court or appellate court despite having 5+ years since the original judgment. The court upheld that execution stay orders under CPC Rule 26 are only meant to provide reasonable time for judgment-debtors to approach higher forums, not indefinite stay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case