SI of Police, Valparai vs Nisha — 50/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,324,506(2). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 09th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCB150003842022
Filing Number
333/2022
Filing Date
20-Oct-2022
Registration No
50/2022
Registration Date
20-Oct-2022
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Valparai
Judge
1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 19-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SI of Police, Valparai
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nisha
-
2.Rajammal
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Mar-2026
Judgement
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Nov-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Summary This is a witness deposition document (not a final court judgment) in a criminal case (CC No. 50/2022) from Valpuram Magistrate Court in Tamil Nadu. The retired Assistant Sub-Inspector testified about his investigation into Case No. 57/2021 involving charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 324, 506(ii) and the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harmful Publications Act. The defense cross-examination raised significant procedural irregularities: the investigating officer failed to independently examine the injured victim (Jegan), did not separately document witness statements despite conflicting accounts about the number of attackers (one vs. three), and mechanically filed charges without thorough investigation despite contradictions in medical records and injury documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Nov-2025
Questioning
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Oct-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
23-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Oct-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
10-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Sep-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
03-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Aug-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Aug-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
19-Aug-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Jul-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Jun-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
19-May-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-May-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Apr-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Mar-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Mar-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Feb-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Jan-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Dec-2024
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Dec-2024
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Nov-2024
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Nov-2024
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Nov-2024
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Nov-2024
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Oct-2024
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
25-Oct-2024
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Oct-2024
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Oct-2024
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Oct-2024
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Sep-2024
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Sep-2024
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Aug-2024
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Jul-2024
Issue of Service
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Jun-2024
Issue of Service
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Jun-2024
Issue of Service
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Jun-2024
Issue of Service
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Apr-2024
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
26-Apr-2024
Issue of Service
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Mar-2024
Issue of Service
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Feb-2024
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
29-Feb-2024
Issue of Service
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Dec-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Nov-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Oct-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Sep-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Sep-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Aug-2023
Framing of Charges
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Jul-2023
Framing of Charges
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
30-May-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Apr-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Mar-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Jan-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Nov-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Oct-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 50/2022
Summary This is a witness deposition document (not a final court judgment) in a criminal case (CC No. 50/2022) from Valpuram Magistrate Court in Tamil Nadu. The retired Assistant Sub-Inspector testified about his investigation into Case No. 57/2021 involving charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 324, 506(ii) and the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harmful Publications Act. The defense cross-examination raised significant procedural irregularities: the investigating officer failed to independently examine the injured victim (Jegan), did not separately document witness statements despite conflicting accounts about the number of attackers (one vs. three), and mechanically filed charges without thorough investigation despite contradictions in medical records and injury documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts