Sub Inspector of police,Valparai vs Niyas Advocate - R.R.Perumal B.A.,B.L — 22/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294 b 325. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCB150003162022
Next Hearing
29th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
269/2022
Filing Date
23-09-2022
Registration No
22/2022
Registration Date
12-10-2022
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Valparai
Judge
1-DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sub Inspector of police,Valparai
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Niyas Advocate - R.R.Perumal B.A.,B.L
Hearing History
Judge: 1-DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 25-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 04-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 25-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a witness deposition (not a final court order) in Criminal Case No. 22/2022 before the District Munsiff Court, Valparirai, recorded on May 8, 2025. The witness testified that on February 23, 2022, he found the complainant (A.Sa.1 Ahmadu Sathik) bleeding from his nose and transported him to the government hospital; during cross-examination, the witness acknowledged he did not personally see the accused (Muhammad Niyaz) commit the assault, though he was present at the scene. The witness's statement was recorded under CrPC Section 54 and admitted to be correct by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a witness deposition (not a final court order) in Criminal Case No. 22/2022 before the District Munsiff Court, Valparirai, recorded on May 8, 2025. The witness testified that on February 23, 2022, he found the complainant (A.Sa.1 Ahmadu Sathik) bleeding from his nose and transported him to the government hospital; during cross-examination, the witness acknowledged he did not personally see the accused (Muhammad Niyaz) commit the assault, though he was present at the scene. The witness's statement was recorded under CrPC Section 54 and admitted to be correct by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts