SI of Police Valparai vs Vincent (Wilson) Advocate - S.M. SIVASUBRAMANIAM, B.A., B.L., — 24/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),387,506(2). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCB150002532023
Next Hearing
22nd May 2026
Filing Number
240/2023
Filing Date
23-05-2023
Registration No
24/2023
Registration Date
23-05-2023
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Valparai
Judge
1-DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
FIR Details
FIR Number
20
Police Station
Valparai police station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI of Police Valparai
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Vincent (Wilson) Advocate - S.M. SIVASUBRAMANIAM, B.A., B.L.,
Hearing History
Judge: 1-DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 28-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 25-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case CC.No.24/2023 - Witness Depositions Summary This document records witness depositions in a criminal case heard on November 24, 2025, before the District Civil and Sessions Court, Walparai. Six witnesses testified under cross-examination, with the accused (Vincent) absent. The witnesses' statements appear contradictory regarding an alleged incident involving abusive language and threats. Multiple witnesses retracted or contradicted their initial complaint allegations during cross-examination, with several admitting no actual incident occurred or that the complaint was falsely registered to seek revenge against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case CC.No.24/2023 - Witness Depositions Summary This document records witness depositions in a criminal case heard on November 24, 2025, before the District Civil and Sessions Court, Walparai. Six witnesses testified under cross-examination, with the accused (Vincent) absent. The witnesses' statements appear contradictory regarding an alleged incident involving abusive language and threats. Multiple witnesses retracted or contradicted their initial complaint allegations during cross-examination, with several admitting no actual incident occurred or that the complaint was falsely registered to seek revenge against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts