Tata Coffee Limited vs Palanimuthu, P.F.No.2316 — 100058/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7(1). Status: Steps. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCB150001872018
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
100058/2018
Filing Date
26-04-2018
Registration No
100058/2018
Registration Date
28-04-2018
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Valparai
Judge
1-DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Tata Coffee Limited
Adv. T.Paul Pandi, M.S.No.658/94
Respondent(s)
Palanimuthu, P.F.No.2316
Hearing History
Judge: 1-DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Steps
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Steps |
| 21-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 15-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 10-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 30-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
This is a Tamil-language civil court order dated 20.08.2019 in Case No. 58/2018. The court examined a dispute regarding the unauthorized cutting of 13 trees on company property by the respondent. The magistrate found the respondent's claims and evidence contradictory and concluded that proper documentation was not provided to support his actions. The court ordered that the case regarding unauthorized tree-cutting should proceed, dismissing the respondent's defenses and finding merit in the complainant's allegations of damage to company property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a Tamil-language civil court order dated 20.08.2019 in Case No. 58/2018. The court examined a dispute regarding the unauthorized cutting of 13 trees on company property by the respondent. The magistrate found the respondent's claims and evidence contradictory and concluded that proper documentation was not provided to support his actions. The court ordered that the case regarding unauthorized tree-cutting should proceed, dismissing the respondent's defenses and finding merit in the complainant's allegations of damage to company property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts