SI Of Police Valparai Ps vs Siva — 1/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),506(ii). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 13th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCB150001542024
Next Hearing
13th May 2026
e-Filing Number
12-01-2024
Filing Number
148/2024
Filing Date
24-01-2024
Registration No
1/2024
Registration Date
24-01-2024
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Valparai
Judge
1-DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
FIR Details
FIR Number
04
Police Station
Valparai police station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI Of Police Valparai Ps (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
Siva
Ranjith
Hearing History
Judge: 1-DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Evidence
Evidence
Steps
Steps
Steps
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 24-03-2026 | Steps | |
| 10-03-2026 | Steps | |
| 25-02-2026 | Steps |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: CC.No.01/2024 | Court: District Civil and Commercial Court, Walparai | Date: 24 March 2026 Outcome: Witness deposition recorded under Chapter XXIII of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The witness (Balan, a printing press operator, age 39) testified that he does not know the accused Veerasiveli and denied involvement in the case. During government cross-examination, the witness retracted his earlier police statement, claiming he was not present during the site inspection on 07.01.2024 and was influenced by fear of the accused. The court permitted the witness to be treated as hostile and allowed cross-examination by the prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: CC.No.01/2024 | Court: District Civil and Commercial Court, Walparai | Date: 24 March 2026 Outcome: Witness deposition recorded under Chapter XXIII of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The witness (Balan, a printing press operator, age 39) testified that he does not know the accused Veerasiveli and denied involvement in the case. During government cross-examination, the witness retracted his earlier police statement, claiming he was not present during the site inspection on 07.01.2024 and was influenced by fear of the accused. The court permitted the witness to be treated as hostile and allowed cross-examination by the prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts