Inspector of Police vs Raja — 100053/2016
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCB150001142016
Next Hearing
26th March 2026
Filing Number
100053/2016
Filing Date
03-10-2016
Registration No
100053/2016
Registration Date
03-10-2016
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Valparai
Judge
1-DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police
Respondent(s)
Raja
Hearing History
Judge: 1-DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 22-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: Witness Senthilvel Perumal (PW-9), a field investigator, gave his deposition via video conference in criminal case CC.No. 53/2016 before the District Criminal Court, Valparai on January 29, 2025. The witness testified about his investigation into a complaint filed on August 26, 2016, regarding an incident that occurred at 3:00 PM, and provided details about his investigative procedures, witness interviews, and scene visit. During cross-examination, the defense challenged several aspects of his investigation, including gaps in documentation, failure to visit the crime scene, and inconsistencies in the timeline and witness statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Witness Senthilvel Perumal (PW-9), a field investigator, gave his deposition via video conference in criminal case CC.No. 53/2016 before the District Criminal Court, Valparai on January 29, 2025. The witness testified about his investigation into a complaint filed on August 26, 2016, regarding an incident that occurred at 3:00 PM, and provided details about his investigative procedures, witness interviews, and scene visit. During cross-examination, the defense challenged several aspects of his investigation, including gaps in documentation, failure to visit the crime scene, and inconsistencies in the timeline and witness statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts