Jeyassheelun vs Saroja @ chandrabanu Advocate - BILL KLINTON J — 389/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCB130004612020
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
Filing Number
461/2020
Filing Date
17-12-2020
Registration No
389/2020
Registration Date
17-12-2020
Court
District Munsif Court, Pollachi
Judge
1-District Munsif Court, Pollachi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jeyassheelun
Adv. S.Suresh
Respondent(s)
Saroja @ chandrabanu Advocate - BILL KLINTON J
Jayalakshmi
Adv. Government Pleader
Rajeshwari
Adv. Government Pleader
The District Registrar(Admn) redfields, coimbatore
Adv. Government Pleader
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif Court, Pollachi
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 24-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 15-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This is a court order from the Principal District Civil Court, Pallaichi (dated 18.03.2026, Case No. 389/2020) in Tamil. The document consists of the judge's findings during cross-examination of witnesses, addressing various objections and clarifications raised by defendants 1-3 regarding property ownership disputes, family succession matters, and documentary evidence. The judge dismisses multiple contentions by the defendants regarding property rights, inheritance claims, and the authenticity of documents, while allowing the cross-examination to continue and affirming that the case proceedings are valid and will proceed to completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a court order from the Principal District Civil Court, Pallaichi (dated 18.03.2026, Case No. 389/2020) in Tamil. The document consists of the judge's findings during cross-examination of witnesses, addressing various objections and clarifications raised by defendants 1-3 regarding property ownership disputes, family succession matters, and documentary evidence. The judge dismisses multiple contentions by the defendants regarding property rights, inheritance claims, and the authenticity of documents, while allowing the cross-examination to continue and affirming that the case proceedings are valid and will proceed to completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts