Thangaraj vs Jothimani — 334/2020

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Status: Orders. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNCB130003982020

Orders

Next Hearing

27th March 2026

Filing Number

398/2020

Filing Date

07-11-2020

Registration No

334/2020

Registration Date

07-11-2020

Court

District Munsif Court, Pollachi

Judge

2-ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MUNSIF, POLLACHI

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c)

Petitioner(s)

Thangaraj

Adv. D.nandhagopalakarthikeyan

Respondent(s)

Jothimani

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MUNSIF, POLLACHI

18-03-2026

Orders

06-03-2026

IA Pending

27-02-2026

IA Pending

23-02-2026

IA Pending

17-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

10-06-2022
Copy of Decree
11-02-2026
Copy of Deposition

Summary: This is a property dispute case from the Additional District Civil Court, Pallacode (Case No. 334/2020). The court recorded the cross-examination testimony of a witness (Manikandan) supporting the defendant (his wife) regarding disputed land boundaries and property rights. The witness testified about land measurements, a boundary wall, and a cement sheet demarcation between two adjacent properties, with the court noting that a court commissioner's survey could be conducted to determine the true boundary if required. The matter was adjourned to allow the plaintiff's counsel time to file a response before further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: This is a property dispute case from the Additional District Civil Court, Pallacode (Case No. 334/2020). The court recorded the cross-examination testimony of a witness (Manikandan) supporting the defendant (his wife) regarding disputed land boundaries and property rights. The witness testified about land measurements, a boundary wall, and a cement sheet demarcation between two adjacent properties, with the court noting that a court commissioner's survey could be conducted to determine the true boundary if required. The matter was adjourned to allow the plaintiff's counsel time to file a response before further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Pollachi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case