Manikandan vs Chandirasekaran Advocate - M.A.Kanagaraj — 310/2023
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 27(C). Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCB130003852023
Filing Number
529/2023
Filing Date
24-Nov-2023
Registration No
310/2023
Registration Date
24-Nov-2023
Court
District Munsif Court, Pollachi
Judge
2-Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
Last updated 26-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Manikandan
Adv. N.Kathirvel
-
2.Jayabal
Respondent(s)
-
1.Chandirasekaran Advocate - M.A.Kanagaraj
-
2.Kavitha
Adv. M.A.Kanagaraj
-
3.Surya
Adv. M.A.Kanagaraj
Case History
-
28-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
20-Apr-2026
Amendment
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
02-Apr-2026
Amendment
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
27-Mar-2026
Amendment
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
18-Mar-2026
Amendment
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
10-Mar-2026
Amendment
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
04-Mar-2026
Compliance
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
24-Feb-2026
Orders
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
16-Feb-2026
Orders
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
10-Feb-2026
Orders
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
09-Feb-2026
Orders
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
04-Feb-2026
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
27-Jan-2026
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
08-Jan-2026
Trial
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
12-Dec-2025
Trial
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
03-Dec-2025
Trial
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
13-Nov-2025
Trial
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
06-Nov-2025
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary The Additional District Civil Court at Pollachi dismissed the interim application (IA.3/2025) filed in Original Suit O.S.310/2023 on November 6, 2025. The court rejected the plaintiffs' request for appointment of a court receiver to survey and manage the disputed 4.99-acre property, finding that the plaintiffs had already obtained possession and documented the property details through survey conducted by the district revenue officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Nov-2025
Trial
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
05-Nov-2025
Orders
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
22-Oct-2025
Trial
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
15-Oct-2025
Trial
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
09-Oct-2025
Trial
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
06-Oct-2025
Trial
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
08-Sep-2025
Trial
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
19-Aug-2025
Trial
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
06-Aug-2025
Trial
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
03-Jul-2025
Trial
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
12-Jun-2025
Trial
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
17-Apr-2025
Trial
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
08-Apr-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
19-Feb-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
10-Jan-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
19-Nov-2024
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
22-Oct-2024
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
05-Sep-2024
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
16-Aug-2024
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
25-Jul-2024
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
30-Apr-2024
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
27-Mar-2024
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
13-Mar-2024
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
13-Feb-2024
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
24-Jan-2024
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
12-Jan-2024
Written Statement
Additional District Munsif, Pollachi
-
24-Nov-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Nov-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 310/2023
Case Summary The Additional District Civil Court at Pollachi dismissed the interim application (IA.3/2025) filed in Original Suit O.S.310/2023 on November 6, 2025. The court rejected the plaintiffs' request for appointment of a court receiver to survey and manage the disputed 4.99-acre property, finding that the plaintiffs had already obtained possession and documented the property details through survey conducted by the district revenue officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts