S. Venkateswaran vs N. Thangavel — 290/2023
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 27(c). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCB130003642023
Next Hearing
30th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
498/2023
Filing Date
30-10-2023
Registration No
290/2023
Registration Date
30-10-2023
Court
District Munsif Court, Pollachi
Judge
2-ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MUNSIF, POLLACHI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S. Venkateswaran
Adv. R. Susendhiran
Respondent(s)
N. Thangavel
Sundari
Devarayapuram Panchayat, Rep by its President, Mrs. Sundari
The state, Rep by Block Development Officer
The state Rep by Village Administrative Officer
The state Rep by Tahsildar, Kinathukadavu
The state rep by District Collector, Coimbatore
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MUNSIF, POLLACHI
Evidence
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 16-04-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 02-04-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 24-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a civil land dispute case (A.V. No. 290/2023) from the Additional District Civil Court, Pallacode, dated 16.04.2026. The court recorded witness testimony regarding a dispute over a deep borewell (well No. 339/1 in Devapuram village) and land (Plot No. 133/2 in Sendambalayam village). The witness's credibility was challenged during cross-examination by defendants 3-7, with the court noting inconsistencies in the witness's knowledge about property locations and the alleged interference with the plaintiff's possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a civil land dispute case (A.V. No. 290/2023) from the Additional District Civil Court, Pallacode, dated 16.04.2026. The court recorded witness testimony regarding a dispute over a deep borewell (well No. 339/1 in Devapuram village) and land (Plot No. 133/2 in Sendambalayam village). The witness's credibility was challenged during cross-examination by defendants 3-7, with the court noting inconsistencies in the witness's knowledge about property locations and the alleged interference with the plaintiff's possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts