T.Saravana prakash vs T.kishori Rathimala — 294/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(d),27(c). Status: Orders. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCB130003492020
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
Filing Number
349/2020
Filing Date
06-10-2020
Registration No
294/2020
Registration Date
06-10-2020
Court
District Munsif Court, Pollachi
Judge
2-ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MUNSIF, POLLACHI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
T.Saravana prakash
Adv. D.Nandhagopalakarthikeyan
Respondent(s)
T.kishori Rathimala
R.Ishwarayavenkadaramalaxmi
S.K.G.Ramasamy
Piramala vinshi
Nedhra palanisamy
Nivetha palanisamy
S.VikramMuthu rathina sabari
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MUNSIF, POLLACHI
Orders
Orders
Orders
Orders
Orders
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Orders |
| 06-03-2026 | Orders |
| 02-03-2026 | Orders |
| 23-02-2026 | Orders |
| 16-02-2026 | Orders |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary This is a civil suit (A.V. No. 294/2020) from the Additional District Court, Pallacode involving disputes over irrigation canal rights and land property boundaries. The court conducted cross-examination of the plaintiff's witness on July 23, 2025, regarding allegations that the 4th defendant destroyed irrigation canals and misrepresented property details. The case involves competing claims over land parcels and irrigation water rights, with the plaintiff seeking restoration of irrigation facilities and relief for alleged wrongful destruction. The proceedings continue with cross-examination of remaining witnesses, with further hearings scheduled for defendants 5 and 6. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary This is a civil suit (A.V. No. 294/2020) from the Additional District Court, Pallacode involving disputes over irrigation canal rights and land property boundaries. The court conducted cross-examination of the plaintiff's witness on July 23, 2025, regarding allegations that the 4th defendant destroyed irrigation canals and misrepresented property details. The case involves competing claims over land parcels and irrigation water rights, with the plaintiff seeking restoration of irrigation facilities and relief for alleged wrongful destruction. The proceedings continue with cross-examination of remaining witnesses, with further hearings scheduled for defendants 5 and 6. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts