Vanchimuthu vs Dharumalingam Advocate - G.A.Athipathi — 258/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCB130003342021
Next Hearing
23rd March 2026
Filing Number
333/2021
Filing Date
27-09-2021
Registration No
258/2021
Registration Date
27-09-2021
Court
District Munsif Court, Pollachi
Judge
2-ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MUNSIF, POLLACHI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vanchimuthu
Adv. Chithamparasamy
Respondent(s)
Dharumalingam Advocate - G.A.Athipathi
Marathal
Gopalsamy
Jothimani
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MUNSIF, POLLACHI
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a civil property dispute order from the Additional District Court in Pallaichchi (Case No. 258/2021) dated 02.03.2026. The court recorded witness testimony regarding property rights, land boundaries, shared pathways, water channels, and competing claims between two neighboring properties. The order documents the defendant's sworn statement affirming the terms of a 1976 deed (Rs. 300), clarifying mutual easement rights over a common pathway, water management provisions, and denying allegations of criminal conduct or obstruction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a civil property dispute order from the Additional District Court in Pallaichchi (Case No. 258/2021) dated 02.03.2026. The court recorded witness testimony regarding property rights, land boundaries, shared pathways, water channels, and competing claims between two neighboring properties. The order documents the defendant's sworn statement affirming the terms of a 1976 deed (Rs. 300), clarifying mutual easement rights over a common pathway, water management provisions, and denying allegations of criminal conduct or obstruction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts