Selvaraj vs Ramalingam — 207/2025
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25d. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 15th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCB130002272025
Filing Number
369/2025
Filing Date
17-Sep-2025
Registration No
207/2025
Registration Date
16-Oct-2025
Court
District Munsif Court, Pollachi
Judge
1-District Munsif Court, Pollachi
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree
Last updated 26-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Selvaraj
Adv. Senthilkumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ramalingam
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Primary District Civil Court in Pollachi held that a 24-year-old sale deed agreement dated 16.08.2001 between the plaintiff and defendant cannot be enforced as it has become time-barred under law. The court determined that since the defendant failed to complete the property sale within the contractual 12-month period and no legal action was initiated within the statutory limitation period, the agreement is now void and unenforceable, dismissing the plaintiff's petition with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Disposed
District Munsif Court, Pollachi
-
08-Apr-2026
Judgement
District Munsif Court, Pollachi
-
26-Mar-2026
Judgement
District Munsif Court, Pollachi
-
16-Mar-2026
Judgement
District Munsif Court, Pollachi
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
10-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Munsif Court, Pollachi
-
28-Jan-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif Court, Pollachi
-
18-Dec-2025
Batta
District Munsif Court, Pollachi
-
17-Nov-2025
Service Pending
District Munsif Court, Pollachi
-
16-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 207/2025
Court Decision Summary The Primary District Civil Court in Pollachi held that a 24-year-old sale deed agreement dated 16.08.2001 between the plaintiff and defendant cannot be enforced as it has become time-barred under law. The court determined that since the defendant failed to complete the property sale within the contractual 12-month period and no legal action was initiated within the statutory limitation period, the agreement is now void and unenforceable, dismissing the plaintiff's petition with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts