Padmavathi vs Jegathesh — 174/2022
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 31,27(c). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCB130002122022
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
212/2022
Filing Date
18-04-2022
Registration No
174/2022
Registration Date
18-04-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Pollachi
Judge
2-ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MUNSIF, POLLACHI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Padmavathi
Adv. K.Thangarathinam
Respondent(s)
Jegathesh
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MUNSIF, POLLACHI
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Orders
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 25-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 03-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 20-02-2026 | Orders |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY The petition filed under Order XVI Rule 1(2) of CPC to summon revenue officials as witnesses regarding an alleged discrepancy in land patta (property document) No. 2786 has been dismissed without costs. The court found that the petitioner failed to specify which revenue officer to summon, and critically, the alleged patta discrepancy was never pleaded in the original suit, which concerns only the plaintiff's rights over a cart track. Since evidence must relate to pleadings and the petitioner provided no explanation of relevance, the petition was not maintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The petition filed under Order XVI Rule 1(2) of CPC to summon revenue officials as witnesses regarding an alleged discrepancy in land patta (property document) No. 2786 has been dismissed without costs. The court found that the petitioner failed to specify which revenue officer to summon, and critically, the alleged patta discrepancy was never pleaded in the original suit, which concerns only the plaintiff's rights over a cart track. Since evidence must relate to pleadings and the petitioner provided no explanation of relevance, the petition was not maintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts