Tmt.Nelaveni vs Tmt.Bhakyam — 137/2019
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 27(c). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCB130001962019
Next Hearing
29th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
192/2019
Filing Date
30-04-2019
Registration No
137/2019
Registration Date
30-04-2019
Court
District Munsif Court, Pollachi
Judge
1-District Munsif Court, Pollachi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Tmt.Nelaveni
Adv. P.Kumaravel
Tmt. kannamal @ subathtal
Respondent(s)
Tmt.Bhakyam
Thiru.Gurusamy murukandam
thiru.tahsildar pollachi
Thiru.Sub collector, pollachi
thiru.District collector, coimbatore
Sub division officer, public work department PAP
Excutive Engineer, PAP division pollachi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif Court, Pollachi
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 20-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 18-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 15-04-2026 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
This is a Tamil language court order from the Principal District Civil Court, Pallachiand dated 20.04.2026 (Case No. 137/2019) documenting witness examination and cross-examination proceedings in a property dispute. The order records detailed testimony regarding property divisions, usufructuary rights, and contested claims over Schedule A and Schedule B properties, with the witness addressing multiple questions about property documentation, evidence submission, and allegations of obstruction. The judgment appears to be an interim order documenting witness statements rather than a final ruling on the case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a Tamil language court order from the Principal District Civil Court, Pallachiand dated 20.04.2026 (Case No. 137/2019) documenting witness examination and cross-examination proceedings in a property dispute. The order records detailed testimony regarding property divisions, usufructuary rights, and contested claims over Schedule A and Schedule B properties, with the witness addressing multiple questions about property documentation, evidence submission, and allegations of obstruction. The judgment appears to be an interim order documenting witness statements rather than a final ruling on the case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts