Manickam @ Manickathai vs M.C.Rathinam — 100117/2008
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 7. Disposed: Contested--Decreed without cost on 30th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNCB130000392008
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
117/2008
Filing Date
26-02-2008
Registration No
100117/2008
Registration Date
26-02-2008
Court
District Munsif Court, Pollachi
Judge
1-District Munsif Court, Pollachi
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed without cost
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Manickam @ Manickathai
Adv. Mr.M.A.Kanagaraj
Respondent(s)
M.C.Rathinam
M.R.Chinnaswami
R.Shanthakumar
R.Sampathkumar
Rukmani
V.Vijayan @ Viji
V.Anand
R.Suchi Ravi
V.K.Rangaraja Gounder (Died)
V.R.Senapathi (Died)
V.R.Sakthivel
Radhabai
V.S.Leelavathy
V.S.Udayakumar
V.S.Suryakumar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif Court, Pollachi
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 26-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 17-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 10-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 03-03-2026 | Judgement |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Principal District Munsif Court, Pollachi, decreed the plaintiff's suit in full, declaring her as the sole owner of properties bequeathed under the valid Will dated 23.02.1983 executed by Ponnammal. The court rejected the defendants' alleged codicil dated 14.09.1985 as unproven and surrounded by suspicious circumstances, including the missing original will, lack of contemporaneous disclosure, and doubtful credibility of the scribe. The plaintiffs are entitled to recovery of possession of the suit property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Principal District Munsif Court, Pollachi, decreed the plaintiff's suit in full, declaring her as the sole owner of properties bequeathed under the valid Will dated 23.02.1983 executed by Ponnammal. The court rejected the defendants' alleged codicil dated 14.09.1985 as unproven and surrounded by suspicious circumstances, including the missing original will, lack of contemporaneous disclosure, and doubtful credibility of the scribe. The plaintiffs are entitled to recovery of possession of the suit property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts