M Krishnakumar vs V Kavitha — 1226/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Issue of Service. Next hearing: 07th September 2026.

Issue of Service Next hearing 07-Sep-2026 this date has passed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNCB120079882025

e-Filing Number

15-11-2025

Filing Number

7973/2025

Filing Date

23-Nov-2025

Registration No

1226/2025

Registration Date

21-Dec-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Courts, Pollachi

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

Pollachi Bazaar Police Station

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M Krishnakumar

    Adv. Elango T

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.V Kavitha

Case History

  1. 07-Sep-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Summary: This document records the deposition of witness Krishnakumar (son of Mariyappan) before the Judicial Magistrate No. II, Pollachi on April 18, 2026, in case CC No. 1226/2025. The witness, who is the complainant in the case, testified under oath and submitted six documentary exhibits including bank receipts, postal acknowledgments, and property documents related to the matter. The witness's testimony was recorded in open court, read over/interpreted to the witness in the presence of the accused/accused's pleader, and admitted to be correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1226/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: This document records the deposition of witness Krishnakumar (son of Mariyappan) before the Judicial Magistrate No. II, Pollachi on April 18, 2026, in case CC No. 1226/2025. The witness, who is the complainant in the case, testified under oath and submitted six documentary exhibits including bank receipts, postal acknowledgments, and property documents related to the matter. The witness's testimony was recorded in open court, read over/interpreted to the witness in the presence of the accused/accused's pleader, and admitted to be correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case