Sub Inspector of Police,Kinathukadavu Police Station vs SRIRAM AJAY — 3589/2025

Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4-A. Disposed: Uncontested--Judgement on admission on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNCB120077562025

e-Filing Number

05-11-2025

Filing Number

7741/2025

Filing Date

13-Nov-2025

Registration No

3589/2025

Registration Date

13-Nov-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Courts, Pollachi

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate Court No. 1, Pollachi

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Judgement on admission

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

354

Police Station

Kinathukadavu police station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Tn Prohibition Act Section 4-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sub Inspector of Police,Kinathukadavu Police Station

    Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE KINATHUKADAVU POLICE STATION

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SRIRAM AJAY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate Court, Pollachi, found accused Sri Ram Ajai guilty of an offense under Section 4-A of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000, with an alternative of two weeks simple imprisonment in default. The accused pleaded guilty after the substance of the offense was explained to him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate Court No. 1, Pollachi

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate Court No. 1, Pollachi

  5. 13-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 13-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3589/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate Court, Pollachi, found accused Sri Ram Ajai guilty of an offense under Section 4-A of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000, with an alternative of two weeks simple imprisonment in default. The accused pleaded guilty after the substance of the offense was explained to him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case